JAMES GETS BUTTSLAMMED!!
James Arnold Allen, the criminal, court-adjudicated mentally incompetent lunatic, has tried appealing his case within the Oklahoma Appellate courts, on the grounds.. well.. no grounds, actually. In his numerous, incoherent ramblings, James claims he was unfairly determined mentally incompetent by the court (laughable considering expert analysis and testimony), and that some cartel is after him, trying to steal his businesses (companies that don't generate revenue), and blames same people for the deaths of relatives and animals -- oh and then there's the "they are concealing my child through kidnapping", despite said CHILD being well of adult age and wanting nothing to do with James, especially after reading his court filings!
See, it takes 5 minutes of reading James' FAILINGS to realize he's a paranoid schizophrenic, and today's motion by the Oklahoma Department of Child Support Services, filed in response to James' appeal, laments the insanity and and meritless basis of his arguments, something that was not done throughout the enforcement action. It's nice to see someone not worried about pissing off a voter.
JAMES, ALONG HIS SCHIZOPHRENIC DELUSIONS ABOUT BEING A LAWYER, JUST GOT SLAMMED BY MR. ANDREW WASHECK. I think I'll send the good man a box of cookies 🍪
WARNING: DO NOT TAKE LEGAL ADVICE FROM JAMES ARNOLD ALLEN; you would have better luck not ending up in prison, or an asylum, with CHATGPT -- or even some rando off the street. DOING ANY PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS WITH JAMES ARNOLD ALLEN, OF ADA OKLAHOMA, IS ADVISED AGAINST! DO NOT BECOME ANOTHER VICTIM!
Enjoy the read. Personally speaking, I'm hoping James continues down this path and finally catches the perjury charge he's begging for.
- "His filed 250 points failed to present any question for review"
- (The filed points contains) "so much irrelevant information"...
- "Appealant's propositions ... deviate so far from the relevant points"
- (The filings) "contain an abundance of information that confuses rather than defines the issues to be presented"
- Requests dismissal on the grounds James failed to follow basic rules.
- (James) "has not set for any of the main contentions"
- Cites additional grounds as "numerous, irrelevant, and confusing assignments of error"
Comments
Post a Comment